UN declares Islamic Shari’a Taboo in Council Debates

From now on, all references to human rights violations related to Islamic Sharia’s law are prohibited in the chamber of the UN Human Rights Council. So ruled council president Doru Costea after a dramatic debate in the recently concluded June 2008 session.

It all started when veteran rights activist David Littman – undaunted by the repressive regimes who only last month sought to expel him from the UN – tried to deliver a speech on violence against women and what Islamic scholars can do to prevent it.

Egypt’s Ambassador Roshdy Hassan repeatedly interrupted, aggressively challenging the council president: “Regardless of the result of the vote, I couldn’t care less if I will win or lose this vote, my point is that Islam will not be crucified in this council!”

The president ultimately gave in, declaring: “Statements should refrain from making judgments or evaluations of a particular religion. . . I can promise that at the next evaluation of a religious creed, law, or document, I will interrupt the speaker and will go on to the next one.”

The new ruling follows an Islamic-sponsored text adopted by the council in March 2008 that turned its mandate on freedom of expression upside down. Instead of investigating the actions of governments in order to protect individual freedom, the expert is now charged with investigating individuals — those who “abuse” their freedom of speech through religious or racial discrimination, i.e., by saying anything deemed offensive to Islamic sensibilities. Everyone in the world is now potentially subject to the UN’s new speech control.

What does all of this signify?

An iron curtain has descended across the world’s highest human rights body. Behind that line lie all the human rights violations committed in the name of a certain religion, about which no one dare speak: suicide terror attacks, honor killings, female genital mutilation, forced child marriage, violence against gays, stonings, state censorship of free speech, jailing of bloggers, prohibitions against freedom of religion, and much, much more.

UN officials, diplomats and even major human rights figures have been afraid to take on this new regime, which now exercises an almost total control over the Human Rights Council, as well as increasing measures of influence over other forums of world opinion.

“All that is necessary for the triumph of evil,” said Edmund Burke, “is that good men do nothing.” Would that more people showed the courage of David Littman.

Click here for full transcript of UN debate.